etlc08.org Rotating Header Image

barack obama

White House: Iran sanctions not aimed at oil markets (Reuters)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? The White House said on Thursday the Iran sanctions proposed by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama should be enforced in a way that does not hurt the United States’ allies or disrupt oil markets.

“We want to make sure that the implementation of those sanctions is handled in a way that does not inadvertently do any harm to our allies or to the oil markets,” White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters.

“We believe there is a way to implement them appropriately that achieves the goal that those sanctions have, which is to further isolate and pressure Iran,” Carney said.

(Reporting By Jeff Mason and Laura MacInnis; Editing by Vicki Allen)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/iran/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120202/pl_nm/us_iran_usa_sanctions

heather graham james arness salmonella paul revere tripadvisor zoosk adventure games

Obama’s Oil and Natural Gas Drilling Proposal an Election-Year Ploy (ContributorNetwork)

COMMENTARY | It may be a sign of desperation that President Barack Obama would like to be seen adopting a “try anything” approach to energy production. His re-election may depend on it. But according to USA Today, no one is buying it.

Supporters of oil drilling have slammed Obama’s proposals to open up more areas to oil and natural gas production as a smokescreen. On the other hand, environmentalists are alarmed that Obama has even mentioned oil and natural gas production as options.

Obama is still reeling from his rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline, scandals like Solyndra, and just recently the bankruptcy of an administration backed electric car battery-maker, reported by the Hill newspaper. His green energy approach has been a failure.

Why is Obama suddenly in favor, at least rhetorically, of drilling for oil and natural gas. Has he adopted Sarah Palin’s ideas expressed by “drill, baby, drill?” Perhaps, but as Hot Air reports, an element of Obama’s new policy will financially benefit none other than George Soros, a major Obama campaign contributor and a financier of a number of liberal causes.

Despite the taint of crony capitalism, Obama may have stumbled on a salient fact that has escaped him and his central planning advisers hitherto. One of the reasons for the continuing economic malaise that grips the United States has been Obama’s continued restrictions on oil and natural gas production. Wind and solar energy may or may not pan out some day, but right now cars run on gasoline, not solar panels or wind mills.

One suspects that Obama being a born again oil and natural gas drilling enthusiast is an election year ploy, designed as a short term stimulus to his reelection chances and – perhaps – the economy. If he were to be reelected, one should expect a return to restrictions on oil and natural gas production accompanied by more subsidies to more politically correct means of obtaining energy.

Still, the fact that Obama feels the need to seem to have relented on hydrocarbon fuels is a good start. It should prove an incentive for congressional Republicans, not to mention the presidential candidates, to push even further.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/obama/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20120128/us_ac/10892069_obamas_oil_and_natural_gas_drilling_proposal_an_electionyear_ploy

honey button shockwave contact hamilton barcelona vs manchester united dream

Christie goes after Obama — and Mika (Politico)

A feisty Gov. Chris Christie appeared on MSNBC?s Morning Joe Tuesday, taking on President Barack Obama – and host Mika Brzezinski.

Christie got some friendly ribbing in with Brzezinski, accusing her of being in the ?tank? for Obama.

Continue Reading

Christie: In the ?tank? for Obama

?You are veering – you used to be a voice of reason, you play it both ways, now you are diving deep into the Obama tank. You know it?s the truth,? the governor of New Jersey told Brzezinski. ?It does hurt me because you know, I love Mika?. All we?re looking for from you – we?re not looking for you to come to the dark side – is just a little bit, get to the middle of the road, on the boulevard, Mika. You?re veering off into the shoulder.?

Christie said Brzezinski?s definition of compromise was giving Obama everything he wants.

?Your definition recently of compromise is: everybody agrees with what the president wants, so we can compromise. That?s not what compromise is,? he said.

?And all the people said, ?Amen,?? chimed in ?Morning Joe? host Joe Scarborough.

Christie also took on Obama, accusing him of not showing any leadership and for deciding to ?fritter? away the rest of the year running for reelection.

?[Obama is] someone who still is searching around in a dark room trying to find the light switch of leadership – hasn?t found it yet,? said Christie.

?My quarrel with the president is that he has not stepped up and led,? he added. ?Of course I have philosophical differences with him, but in the end he has not stepped up and led – Simpson-Bowles is the perfect example.?

Christie expressed outrage that Obama would compare himself to Teddy Roosevelt, as he did in a speech earlier this month.

?That was such ridiculous, pabulum-filled pander. For Barack Obama, who is probably the weakest president I?ve seen in my lifetime, to stand up and utter his name in the same breath as Teddy Roosevelt? Are you kidding me?? said Christie. ?For him to sit there and say, ?it?s time for us to step up our game,? ?it?s time meet the moment?? Well you know Mr. President we?ve been waiting for you to meet the moment for three years.?

The governor said that Mitt Romney, whom he has endorsed for president, has showed the leadership that the president lacks.

?Mitt Romney is going to the Republican nominee for president, and when he is, he has proven before that he can reach across the aisle. He was the governor in Massachusetts with an overwhelmingly Democratic legislature, and got things done when he was there. That is something Barack Obama has never in his life proven he can do. Voting present in the Illinois state legislature doesn?t count.?

Christie revealed that he has advised Romney to be ?edgier and bolder.?

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on the other hand, got a much harsher treatment from Christie.

?I think the problem for us, if Speaker Gingrich were at the top, is that the election would be about Speaker Gingrich and not about the president. I think, as Republicans, this election has to be about the president. The speaker just can?t help himself but make himself the center of attention all the time, for the comments he makes,? Christie said.

?New Jerseyans have a long memory about his time as speaker of the House and he was very unpopular in New Jersey back then? people saw him as uncompromising and incendiary,? he added.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/politico_rss/rss_politico_mostpop/http___www_politico_com_news_stories1211_70680_html/43959661/SIG=11m99gnao/*http%3A//www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70680.html

river song patti labelle fred mojo karate kid marie antoinette weather chicago

Poll: Little love for big gov (Politico)

Americans? fear of big government – partly fueled by a sharp spike among Democrats since President Barack Obama took office – almost reached a record high this year and is far greater than people?s concerns about big business and big labor, a new Gallup poll Monday shows.

An overwhelming 64 percent of people surveyed said big government was the biggest threat to the country, compared to just 26 percent who said big business is their gravest concern and 8 percent who picked big labor.

Continue Reading

The all-time high for percentage of people who said big government was the biggest threat to the country was in 1999 and 2000, when 65 percent named it the country?s biggest menace.

Republicans are most wary of the threat of big government than are Democrats or independents ? 82 percent of GOPers said big government was the biggest threat to the nation, compared to 64 percent of independents and 48 percent of Democrats who said the same.

The percentage of Democrats who said big government was the most significant threat to the U.S., 48 percent, has seen a notable climb since 2009, when 32 percent of the political party said big government was the most dangerous to the country?s well-being.

GOPers have become increasingly concerned about big government since 2006 when President George W. Bush was in office ? 68 percent of Republicans said 5 years ago that big government was the biggest threat to the nation ? in 2009 and 2011, this percentage crept up into the 80?s.

The Gallup poll was conducted Nov. 28-Dec. 1 among 1,012 adults ages 18 and older, and has an error of margin of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/politico_rss/rss_politico_mostpop/http___www_politico_com_news_stories1211_70318_html/43885807/SIG=11mc2b1ip/*http%3A//www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70318.html

san francisco giants honduras usain bolt comfort inn orioles liberty mutual bahamas

Democrats encouraged about Obama in 2012 (AP)

WASHINGTON ? After a dreary summer marred by the fight over government borrowing, rank-and-file Democrats say they are growing more optimistic about President Barack Obama’s political prospects in 2012. They cite his tougher, more populist tone and what they view as a chaotic primary fight among Republicans.

Many Democrats acknowledged that high unemployment and economic uncertainty create formidable obstacles for the incumbent. But interviews with more than a dozen Democratic activists across the nation found support for Obama’s more forceful message against GOP lawmakers and interest in rebutting the presidential candidates.

Several pointed to Obama’s speech last week in Kansas, where he argued that the middle class had been under duress for the past decade and economic policies must give everyone a “fair shot and a fair share.”

“He didn’t have his voice and we didn’t have our voice,” said David Leland, an attorney in Columbus, Ohio, and former state party chairman. “But now he has successfully turned that particular corner and most people are much more enthusiastic and much more fired up about it.”

Added Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Senate Democrat: “What he said in Kansas brought us back down to basics.” Durbin told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday that “this is a make-or-break moment for the middle class in America.”

Entering 2012, Obama faces a set of economic numbers that have improved but that no incumbent would relish: unemployment of 8.6 percent in November, down from 9 percent in October; consumer confidence of 56, well below the level where a president typically gets re-elected; and an economy that has created 100,000 or more jobs five months in a row ? the first time that has happened since April 2006.

Politically, Obama’s approval rating, as measured by Gallup, has been in the low 40s during the fall and hasn’t topped 50 percent since last May. Polls typically show about three-quarters of voters view the nation on the wrong track. Republicans have blamed Obama for high unemployment and rising debt, contending that his policies have failed to lift America from recession.

Nonetheless, a month before the first vote in the GOP nominating race, many Democrats said they were encouraged by the topsy-turvy contest. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich have been battling for the lead while businessman Herman Cain, who’s now dropped out, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry stumbled after rising in polls.

“Obama has not been everything I’ve wanted him to be but he’s sure a heck of a lot better than any of the Republicans who have raised their hands,” said Tom Bordeaux, a former Georgia legislator who was recently elected to an alderman seat in Savannah, Ga.

Mary Gail Gwaltney, a member of the Democratic National Committee from Las Cruces, N.M., said she felt stronger about Obama now “because I’m looking at the other party’s field and they don’t have a strong candidate.”

Obama’s tone and message are pivotal, they said.

Many activists said they were unhappy with Obama’s attempt to reach concessions with Republicans last summer during summer negotiations over the government’s borrowing limit. But they said they were reassured when he proposed a jobs bill in September and hit the road trying to sell the package.

Only one provision has been enacted, tax incentives to encourage companies to hire unemployed veterans. Still, many party organizers said Obama’s fight with congressional Republicans over payroll tax cuts, unemployment benefits and efforts to force the wealthy to pay more in taxes would help their cause.

“He has to be seen as a champion for the average person,” said George Nee, president of the Rhode Island AFL-CIO. “I think that’s where his heart is ? that’s what he believes ? but he’s been too tentative in showing it. I guess in the labor movement, we come from the perspective that we’ve got to know where you are.”

Rob Tully, a former Iowa Democratic party chairman who supported John Edwards in the 2008 Iowa caucuses, said that last summer many of his party allies shared his sense of frustration that Obama “was not engaging in the fight” with Republicans. But he said Obama’s more populist tone and attention to bread-and-butter issues for middle-class voters has resonated with him.

“I was frustrated with him but I have come full circle, back to the fold,” Tully said.

Beyond the message, many activists said Obama’s organizational efforts should help their cause. The campaign has been recruiting tens of thousands of volunteers to help with the re-election campaign. Democrats contend Obama will have a yearlong head start over the Republican nominee and his organization should outpace that of his eventual rival.

“He understands clearly that there’s a race and some of the things that worked for him in the (2008) election aren’t going to work this time,” said Judy Kennedy, a DNC member from Phoenix.

Kennedy said she was deeply concerned about Obama’s chances over the summer but came away reassured after meeting with campaign officials in Chicago last September. “My feelings about it have improved dramatically over the last few months.”

Debbie Dingell, a DNC member and the wife of Michigan Rep. John Dingell, said many Democrats long have recognized the headwinds facing them next year and are working to organize voters in the most effective way.

“It’s going to be a tough year and because of that, they’re not kidding themselves that this isn’t going to be challenging and they’re prepared for a tough fight,” she said.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111211/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_democrats_obama_s_prospects

calendar 2012 sister wives neil diamond tmobile def leppard epo the simpsons

AP source: Specific, unconfirmed threat received

AP source: Specific, unconfirmed threat received

AP/John Minchillo

A pedestrian passes under the watchful eyes of surveillance cameras in Times Square in New York, Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2011.

Counterterrorism officials said Thursday they are investigating a credible but unconfirmed terror threat involving New York or Washington.

The threat was so specific, and coming at a time of already heightened security just days before the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, that it could not be ignored, a counterterrorism official told The Associated Press. The official requested anonymity to discuss sensitive security information.

Officials would not tell the AP what specifically is being targeted in New York or Washington or the timing of a potential attack. A government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said raising the terror alert is under consideration.

A law enforcement official in New York, also speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive security information, described the threat as credible but declined to give details.

Information gleaned from Osama bin Laden’s compound in May indicated that al-Qaida had considered attacking the U.S. on the 10th anniversary and other important dates. Security has been enhanced around the country, including in New York and Washington, in the weeks leading up to Sunday’s anniversary.

President Barack Obama was briefed on the threat information Thursday morning and directed the counterterrorism community to redouble its efforts in response to the credible but unconfirmed information, a White House official said.

“There were very, very specific facts that were made known in this threat,” Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., told CNN. “I would tell people right now to go about their lives. There’s no need to panic. We don’t know if this threat is real yet. It’s being tracked down.”

White House officials said there were no plans to change Obama’s travel schedule on Sunday in light of the threat. The president is scheduled to mark the 9/11 anniversary with stops at New York’s ground zero, the Pentagon and Shanksville, Pa. He will also deliver remarks Sunday night at a memorial concert at the Kennedy Center in Washington.

“It’s accurate that there is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information,” Homeland Security Department spokesman Matt Chandler said in a statement. “As we always do before important dates like the anniversary of 9/11, we will undoubtedly get more reporting in the coming days.”

The threat was received late Wednesday night, the counterterrorism official told the AP, and law enforcement has been investigating its validity since. The threat came in a single piece of information and intelligence officials could not determine if it was related to previous intelligence, the official said.

Thursday morning, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters that there was “a lot of chatter” around the anniversary of the attacks but that there was no information about a specific threat.

Associated Press writers Julie Pace in Washington and Tom Hays in New York contributed to this report.

Source: http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/09/08/us_terror_threat/index.html

ocean city nj rush hour rush hour holes da vinci code new england new england